The Controversy of the World Trade Center: Real or Fiction?

 

It is no secret that the government's official version of the September 11, 2001 attacks is riddled with misinformation and ignored findings, ultimately rendering it a work of fiction. One cannot help but notice the haste in which the public was fed this version of events the very next day. Despite extensive revelations about the attacks, the official narrative has remained unchanged, as if our government deems it irrelevant after taking advantage of the situation to pass unconstitutional laws and engage in conflicts that reap oil profits. It is time for us, as a nation, to acknowledge the bitter truth and move on.

It is a well-known fact that the towers were not brought down by planes, but rather by bombs. So why use the planes as a means of destruction? It seems the planes were merely a diversionary tactic - a grand spectacle, if you will. But who would benefit from diverting our attention from the true cause of the towers' collapse? It can only be those who reaped the most gain from the attacks. Let us consider some facts from that fateful day.

According to military response code 7610-4J, any deviation from the aircraft's designated course warrants a military intercept. Strangely enough, this was the first time such interceptors were not sent out in the history of this policy. The pilots are specifically trained to visually assess the cockpit in such situations... could this be the reason why these interceptors were intercepted themselves? Furthermore, the planes that were eventually dispatched to the New York area were significantly delayed and came from Falmouth, Massachusetts instead of the nearby Ft. Dix or LaGuardia. Unsurprisingly, they did not arrive in time to carry out the necessary visual scan of the cockpits.

Retired from the Air Force, Captain Kent Hill disclosed that the United States had conducted unmanned aerial expeditions, comparable in size to a Boeing 737, on predetermined flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on multiple occasions. According to him, the airborne vehicles utilized in the hijackings suffered from impaired onboard computers and were subsequently piloted by the Airborne Warning and Control System. Alongside Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with considerable Vietnam combat experience attested, "Those avian entities either harbored a skilled fighter aviator in the captain's seat, or they were remotely steered."

Unquestionably, the technology required to remotely navigate hijacked commercial aircraft exists - it is known as "Globalhawk." Additionally, the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft labeled the "Predator" since 1994. In theory, a malevolent individual could easily reprogram the controls to transition from manual to remote; these airliners are virtually autonomous already with the utilization of an autopilot. This scheme would necessitate obtaining electronic security codes...the acquisition of such codes would also justify the delayed pursuit of interceptors due to covert interferences. Moreover, substantiating that a rebellious entity was involved, Air Force One codes were illicitly accessed and entered on September 11th, altogether proving that an internal insurgency occurred.

Without fail, any conspiracy worth talking about must have a Bush at the center! Meet Marvin Bush - the brother of George Jr. Not only is Marvin a major shareholder, but he also served on the Board of Directors of a security company aptly named Securacom until 2000. This is not your typical security force with canvas badges and walkie-talkies; it is an innovative electronic security company that just so happened to be involved with Dulles Airport until 1998. Managing the electronic security at Dulles provided a convenient way to obtain Air Traffic Control communication codes from NORAD, the agency in charge of intercept missions.

According to CEO Barry McDaniel, the company "handled some of the security at the World Trade Center up to the very day the buildings collapsed." How serendipitous, right? It's worth considering that bombs were planted in those towers... and that Bush's presidency was saved by these attacks. Just something to ponder.

In a surprising turn of events, five of the twenty "suicide hijackers" are still alive and well, according to the BBC. They are seeking to clear their names. So, who was actually flying those planes? We may never know the full story, but what we do know is that the official version of events crumbles when placed under scrutiny. Those planes were nothing more than a diversion, as evidenced by the presence of bombs... yes, it has been proven!

Prior to embarking on this piece, I had the privilege of conversing with Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr., at the World Trade Center Memorial. In light of the irrefutable cover-up, Paul, like many other firemen, is deeply disturbed and has taken it upon himself to seek out answers and demand justice. From 1998 to 1999, he was stationed at Engine 10, situated across the street from the World Trade Center, and his battalion was completely obliterated in the calamitous downfall of the towers. As he divulged to me, "[...] several other firemen are aware of the presence of explosives in the buildings, but they fear repercussions for admitting it, as the higher authorities have forbidden any dialogue on the matter." Paul went on to explain that the Fire Department's Anti-terrorism Consultant, former CIA director Robert Woolsey, has imposed a gag order that extends to all ranks. "Make no mistake, there were undoubtedly explosives planted in those buildings," he insisted.

Furthermore, he clarified that if the buildings had indeed "pancaked," as they were colloquially described, the collapsing floors would have encountered formidable resistance from the sturdy steel support columns, causing debris to be hurled outwards and wreaking havoc in the surrounding areas. I inquired about the trusses and referenced the History Channel's "don't trust a truss" explanation for the collapses. Paul's response was one of utter disbelief as he exclaimed, "You couldn't possibly construct a truss building that tall! Even a slight gust of wind would topple it over. Those towers stood strong due to reinforced steel support, and buildings simply do not implode like that; this was a deliberate demolition."

In the aftermath of the calamity, Firefighter Louie Cacchioli remarked, "We surmise that the structure was targeted by explosives." Take notice of his use of the pronoun "we". At precisely 9:04, immediately following the collision of Flight 175 with the South Tower, a tremendous blast erupted, shooting up 550 feet from the U.S. Customs House commonly referred to as WTC 6. The area where the building once stood bears a massive crater. It is evident that something other than an airplane caused the destruction of WTC 6; it must have been an explosive device.

The seismograph data from Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, NY (21 miles away) serves as incontrovertible evidence that immense explosions led to the collapse of these towers. At the exact moment the South Tower began to crumble, a 2.1 earthquake was recorded on the seismograph. Similarly, at the precise moment the North Tower started to collapse, a 2.3 earthquake was registered. However, as the buildings imploded, these seismic waves vanished. The two spikes on the seismograph, both occurring at the precise instants of the collapses, had amplitudes twenty times greater and forces more than 100 times stronger than the other waves. If the buildings had simply collapsed, the most significant tremors would have occurred upon impact with the ground, not at the onset of the collapses. According to seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam of Columbia University, "Only a small fraction of the energy released during the collapses resulted in ground motion."

The impact of the towers' collapse produced minimal seismic activity, equivalent to 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes. These tremors were not caused by the demolitions. However, according to seismographs, underground nuclear explosions would generate sudden and brief spikes. Such detonations would occur at the junction of the steel columns and Manhattan's granite, explaining the implosion-style collapses as well as the 'spikes' recorded on the seismograph.

Won Young Kim, a seismologist at the Palisades observatory, concurs that the 1993 truck bomb did not register on their seismographs. He explains this by stating that the explosion was not coupled to the ground. One can only imagine the magnitude of such explosions that would be required to produce seismic activity, considering the truck bomb failed to have any impact.

In a report by the American Free Press, it was revealed that in the basements of the collapsed towers, hot spots of "literally molten steel" were discovered over a month after the attack. This discovery can only be explained by an explosion of unprecedented magnitude that destroyed the foundations of the 47 central support columns (per building) and trapped intense heat below the rubble for an extended period.

The second tower, being struck less directly by the plane and with most of the jet fuel igniting outside, sustained lesser damage compared to the first tower. However, as ironic fate would have it, this tower collapsed first. As the firefighters were battling the intense flames on the burning floors, they could be heard saying, "Battalion seven... Ladder fifteen, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines." It is confounding how two isolated pockets of fire could lead to the collapse of the entire tower, causing the support columns to cave in. In an interview, Paul Isaac stated, "Based on video footage of the collapse of the South Tower, the structural collapse is not consistent with the angle the building was struck."

Curiously, no investigation was permitted on the debris. Dr. W. Gene Corley, who led the FEMA sponsored engineering assessment of the World Trade Center collapse, did not conduct any tests on the steel for traces of explosives. When questioned about this process, known as 'twinning,' he replied, "I am not a metallurgist." It is worth noting that Dr. Corley also 'investigated' the debris at both Waco and Oklahoma City... and we all know how thorough those 'investigations' were.

To add to the suspicion, no government agency performed forensic examinations on the rubble, nor did they make any effort to validate their official story. Instead, the rubble was swiftly loaded onto ships and sent to China for smelting. These actions parallel those of criminals attempting to dispose of evidence. By these actions, FEMA proves itself to be a subversive element within our government.

"The primary hindrances to probing Islamic terrorism," according to John P. O'Neil, the former Deputy Director of the FBI, "were the vested interests of U.S. oil corporations and the involvement of Saudi Arabia." Can you identify anyone (such as President Bush) with ties to affluent Saudi Arabians and American corporate oil companies? After serving for 31 years, O'Neil resigned from the FBI when Barbara Bodine, who is currently part of the Iraqi transition team, forbade him from pursuing his investigation into the U.S.S. Cole attack. He then accepted a position as head of security at the World Trade Center... and his first day of work was September 11, 2001. O'Neil secured the job through Jerome Howard, the former director of the New York Office of Emergency Management, who coincidentally had the day off on 9/11. The circumstances surrounding Mr. O'Neil's departure from the FBI are left to speculation, but it is clear that he may have been a hindrance to the interests of U.S. oil corporations... especially during the ongoing wars for oil and power in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Investigations into Zacarais Moussaoui by top FBI officials in Minneapolis were abruptly halted, leading to resentment among field agents. The individual responsible for the decision was even promoted. Interestingly, Israeli intelligence agents resided near the alleged hijackers in Hollywood, Florida. These supposed "hijackers" were trained at US government flight schools, raising suspicions of insider training within United Airlines. This also suggests that those with insider knowledge may have been relatively well-off. Another suspicious finding is that the World Trade Center was sold to Vornado Realty Trust in February, seven months prior to the attacks, for a whopping 3.25 billion dollars. While this may not prove anything, it certainly raises eyebrows.

But who benefited the most from the attacks on September 11th? And who had the motive? According to Ehud Sprinzak, an expert on terrorism at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, "From the perspective of Jews, it is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor." And David Stern, an expert on Israeli intelligence operations, believes that carrying out such an attack would require a high level of military precision and the resources of an advanced intelligence agency. He also points out that the attackers would need to be extremely familiar with Air Force One flight operations, civilian flight paths, and aerial assault tactics on sensitive locations such as Washington. He further claims, "This attack does not serve the interests of any Arab group or nation, but its timing coincides with international condemnation of Israel..." He goes on to say that "A US military intelligence report revealed a detailed international memo that linked Mossad to the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. This memo was circulating three weeks before the attacks occurred."

Adding fuel to the fire of suspicion surrounding Mossad's potential involvement, five individuals, presumed to be Israeli agents, were captured on video smiling and celebrating atop a van across the Hudson River as the disaster unfolded. They were arrested by the FBI and detained for two months before being deported back to Israel. Interestingly, out of the 81 nations whose citizens perished in the World Trade Center attack, Israel was not among them, despite having approximately 1200 citizens who worked in the towers. As if that wasn't enough evidence, an Israeli instant messaging firm called Odigo received warnings about the impending attacks two hours prior. Rather than being labeled 'anti-Semitic' for raising these issues, we must acknowledge that the truth holds no bias towards any race or religion.

According to WorldTradeCenter.com, David Rockefeller is described as the "Visionary behind the World Trade Center." Despite major opposition, he, along with his brother and then-governor Nelson Rockefeller, pushed for the construction of these towers. In fact, David himself has been quoted saying, "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Was this deliberate attack the chosen "major crisis" to further the agenda of a global government?

The findings present overwhelming evidence that the alleged Arab terrorists served as mere scapegoats to further the agenda of the World Government. While the attacks took place, "President" George Jr. was reading a book with school children featuring goats. (Scapegoats?) It becomes clear that the Arab terrorists did not orchestrate these attacks, which had devastating consequences for the Muslim world.

In fact, all evidence points to elements within the highest levels of the Israeli and United States governments. These individuals seeking to establish a world government through their control over finance, media, and militaries are unquestionably responsible for these despicable crimes. This atrocity appears to serve their agenda of advancing domestic police state policies and consolidating the oil reserves in the Middle East.

The wealthiest, most privileged, and powerful men on Earth stand to gain the most from these attacks. They believe that through the implementation of their New World Order, they will finally hold dominion over nations worldwide. For some of these Globalists, the attacks were simply a means to an end - a significant step towards establishing a world socialist system. But for others, likely the masterminds behind this heinous act, it was a mass sacrifice to themselves. These power-hungry individuals, consumed by their sick fantasies, orchestrated a mass ritual sacrifice of the vulnerable, along with the heroes who tried to save them. It is clear that these twisted individuals, acting as Satanic forces, are responsible for this unspeakable crime.